Within‐clade allometric relationships represent standard laws of scaling between energy and size, and their outliers provide new avenues for physiological and ecological research. According to the metabolic level boundaries hypothesis, metabolic rates as a function of mass are expected to scale closer to 0.67 when driven by surface‐related processes (e.g., heat or water flux), while volume‐related processes (e.g., activity) generate slopes closer to one. In birds, daily energy expenditure (DEE) scales with body mass (M) in the relationship log (DEE) = 2.35 + 0.68 * log (M), consistent with surface‐level processes driving the relationship. However, taxon‐specific patterns differ from the scaling slope of all birds. Hummingbirds have the highest mass‐specific metabolic rates among all vertebrates. Previous studies on a few hummingbird species, without accounting for the phylogeny, estimated that the DEE‐body mass relationship for hummingbirds was log (DEE) = 1.72 + 1.21 * log (M). Contrary to theoretical expectations, this slope greater than 1 indicates that larger hummingbirds are less metabolically efficient than smaller hummingbirds. We collected DEE and mass data for 12 hummingbird species, which, combined with published data, represented 17 hummingbird species in eight of nine hummingbird clades over a six‐fold size range of body size (2.7 ‐ 17.5 g). After accounting for phylogenetic relatedness, we found daily energy expenditure scales with body mass as log (DEE) = 2.04 + 0.95 * log (M). This slope of 0.95 is lower than previously estimated for hummingbirds, but much higher than the slope for all birds (0.68). The high slopes of torpor, hovering and flight potentially explain the high interspecific DEE slope for hummingbirds compared to other endotherms.